General Info/News Archive

0

The Season Of Construction Is At Hand…

In Pennsylvania there are really only 2 seasons, Winter and Construction.  Rte 83 in Harrisburg has been under some form of repair/construction for about 3 years now.  The latest project is a redesign of the 581/83 bridge that runs between Carlisle/Camp Hill and Harrisburg.  This section of highway is ridiculous, it can’t handle 1/3 of the traffic it sees and the construction was long overdue.  I am so glad I no longer fight work near there and have to engage in vehicular combat with the state drones twice a day.  I am sure the union slackers will get it done under-budget and ahead of schedule (lol).

constructin season

Well, there has been a “snag”, a truck transporting diesel fuel rolled over on the one of the interchanges between 22/322 and rte 81.  This is in northern section of H-burg.  When I tell you the trailer burned to the ground, I mean it (see the pic below).  Further details are in the article at the bottom.

interstate-81-truck-fire--ef5b999e0f260acb

The fire damaged the overpass so much that pieces of 322 are falling into the lanes of 81 below.  I am sure this development will do wonders for the locals commutes.  This project will likely need to be done quickly so I expect the costs to high.  I would not be surprised if the costs of the repairs ends up being paid for with a small state-wide gas tax increase.  After all it wouldn’t be fair for the trucker and his trucking company to have to pay the bill, aren’t we all part of the same “village”?

 

Road repairs could take at least two months after tanker fire on Interstate 81

Emily Previti | epreviti@pennlive.com By Emily Previti | epreviti@pennlive.comThe Patriot-News Email the author | Follow on Twitter on May 09, 2013 at  4:19 PM, updated May 10, 2013 at  7:00 AM

Tanker Fire
A tanker truck loaded with diesel fuel overturned about 6:10 a.m on the I-81 northbound ramp to Route 322 west on May 9, 2013. The tanker truck accident closed down Route 22/322 and I-81 in the vicinity of I-81 Exit 67 as PennDOT evaluates the structural damage to the bridges.  Christine Baker | cbaker@pennlive.com

UPDATE: Northbound interchanges of Interstate 81 on west shore reopened this morning

Damage from a fuel tanker explosion near the interchange of Interstate 81 and Route 22/322 will cost tens of millions and shut down a small section of road for two months or more, state officials said Thursday afternoon.

Earlier Thursday morning, a fuel tanker exploded and rolled over on the highway, causing what Gov. Tom Corbett believes is the worst damage to a Pennsylvania highway since a tire fire off I-95 near Philadelphia in 1996.

Both directions of I-81 from Route 581 in Cumberland County to I-81/83 split in Dauphin County are closed. Officials said they expect it to reopen in time for the Monday morning commute.

The ramp from northbound I-81 to westbound Route 22/322 remains closed. Eastbound Route 22 through the interchange toward the City of Harrisburg remains closed.

Earlier this afternoon, PennDOT re-opened the ramp from westbound Route 22 to southbound Interstate 81 in the I-81 Exit 67 interchange.

Tanker Fire
At about 6:10 a.m. Thursday, May 9, 2013, a tanker truck that was fully loaded with diesel fuel overturned on the I-81 northbound ramp to Route 322 west in Susquehanna Township and exploded.  The tanker truck accident closed down Route 22/322 and I-81 in the vicinity of I-81 Exit 67 as PennDOT evaluates the structural damage to the bridges.  Christine Baker | cbaker@pennlive.co

Westbound traffic on Route 22 approaching the I-81 Exit 67 interchange can now continue through the interchange to go west toward Dauphin and State College, north onto northbound I-81, and south onto southbound I-81.

To help ease traffic, Pennsylvania Turnpike tolls are being waived between the Harrisburg East and Carlisle exits. The turnpike said in a news release that tolls will be waived until at least Sunday or Monday.

State officials hope to reopen one lane in each direction to traffic on the outbound side in time for the Monday morning commute, but the inbound side needs to be removed along with the bridge overhead the spot on 81 where the explosion occurred.

Detour signs will be posted on roadways. Officials also encourage motorists to check the

Tanker Fire
At about 6:10 a.m. Thursday, May 9, 2013, a tanker truck that was fully loaded with diesel fuel overturned on the I-81 northbound ramp to Route 322 west in Susquehanna Township and exploded. The tanker truck accident closed down Route 22/322 and I-81 in the vicinity of I-81 Exit 67 as PennDOT evaluates the structural damage to the bridges. Christine Baker | cbaker@pennlive.com

511pa.com traffic web site.

About 2,000 gallons of fuel also spilled into Paxton Creek and Wildwood Lake. Environmental crews are on site cleaning up now and will continue to monitor for at least a couple months.

The explosion and roads closures also caused a gridlock on roads throughout the Harrisburg region that delayed school buses and business openings and will cause delays indefinitely.

State police have not yet released details about the cause of the explosion, the name of the driver, nor the company that owns the truck. He was burned only “mildly”, according to initial reports, despite fuel fire temperatures that can reach as high as 1,400 degrees, PennDOT officials said.

State police expect to release updates to the investigation by Friday.

Corbett is seeking federal approval for an emergency declaration, but said state workers will have a typical schedule Friday. He advised them – and everyone else commuting Friday in the Harrisburg area – to allow extra time to travel.

Original HERE.

2

POS Car

I was reading TBP and Jim Quinn mentioned the first new car he ever bought was a Chevy Beretta. No offense to Jim, but talk about a car that was a piece of sh!t even when it was new. It made me think, I have owned many vehicles, but never bought one brand new (and don’t plan on it), I don’t see the point in it. I am not scared of having someone else’s farts embedded into the seat cushion, I sit on it, I don’t eat off of it. In 15 years I have owned 11 different vehicles (wife thinks I have problem). The newest vehicle I have ever bought was my truck which was 3 years old when I got it; it’s also the only vehicle of the 11 I have ever financed. Almost everyone I know personally who has ever actually been responsible for themselves and their finances (and not dependant on mommy or daddy into their 20′s and 30′s) has owned a POS car at least once. It gives you character; I have always driven them with pride because I knew I was saving money or keeping miles off the cars I enjoyed and cared about, like my MR2.

Probably the best (or worst depending on your perspective) POS car I owned was a 97 Suzuki Swift with 150k on it, it was a white hatchback so a co-worker dubbed it “the egg.”  The Swift was basically a rebadged Geo Metro, its pizza cutter wheels were great in the snow. The cloth headliner sagged and constantly made contact with my hair but I fixed that over a lunch break with a stapler. It had no A/C but the heater kicked ass. The best part was that I bought it for $800 off of a mechanic who kept it well-maintained mechanically. I drove it for almost 3 years without anything more than oil changes being required. I never worried about leaving it at BWI airport when traveling for work (no one would still something so cheap) and it cost $3/month to add to my insurance coverage.

A few years ago, as a gift to ourselves, my wife and I bought a big screen tv but I didn’t want to pay to have it delivered. Then my buddy sold his pickup right before it arrived in the store so I had to find a way to get it home on my own. I took a few measurements, removed the passenger seat and hauled a brand new $1,000 tv home in an $800 car, hahaha, I love telling that story.

Eventually electrical gremlins made it prohibitive to fix so I donated it.  Hopefully it was able to help someone else out as a parts car.

Adam Sandler used to be really funny, Ode To My Car is my favorite song on what I think is his best comedy album: What The Hell Happened to Me?

If you want share you own POS Car “love” stories…

Enjoy.

0

None Shall Pass

Eric Peters with a good commentary on the fact that legal passing zones are disappearing.  Instructing drivers to mindlessly follow the “laws” of the road leads to people who cease to think and make judgement calls on their own.  Some will say “but the idiots out there will…”; having idiot drivers isn’t an issue of “law”, you can’t legislate away stupidity; it is an issue of incompetence in the testing/training/licensing requirements.  Many were given a full functioning brain when all they plan on using is the stem.

NONE SHALL PASS!

The black knight is a pretty close representation of the stupidity of the gubbermint/system, and it really does think it is infallible and invincible.  I say we start cutting off its limbs.

 

The Double Yellow Prison

October 10, 2012

By

This country is painted over with double yellow bars – a sort of rolling-ribbon prison, from which escape is not possible. Or at least, very difficult. Legal passing zones – always rare – are becoming almost nonexistent. Painted over – for no readily discernible reason.

Well, actually, there is a reason:

It’s all based on the idea that because some people are too inept to execute a quick, safe pass when the opportunity arises, no one shall pass. It does not matter that some drivers have the judgment and skill needed to perform a safe, efficient pass. They get ticketed just the same – and irrespective of the competence of their maneuvering. The ticketing cop may even admit – in court – that the driver he ticketed wasn’t proceeding recklessly; even that his pass was safe. Such considerations are irrelevant in a modern American traffic court. Legally speaking, the only relevant issue is: Did the person violate the law?

The absence of proof of any harm done, any victim (that ancient precept of common law – and long before that, of natural law)  is both irrelevant and no defense.  Guilty. Fine – plus costs.

Next.

Result? Log-jammed traffic almost everywhere – even in rural areas. Not so much because there are more vehicles using the road, but because it is no longer possible (legally) to pass slow-movers except in a handful of designated areas -  very few and far between.

All it takes is one slow-mover to create a Clover Conga. When there are more cars around, there are more slow-movers around.

Which ends up resulting in a perpetual – inescapable – Clover Conga. (For those not hip to the usage of Clover in this context, please see here. To observe Clover in situ, see here.)

The eradication of legal passing zones – and the gimped-up legal doctrines that apply in the few remaining, such as you must never exceed the posted speeeeeeeeeed limit when passing (which makes it all-but-impossible to pass safely) have rendered the United States one giant Clover Cluster-you-know-what.

In more sensible lands, the driver is given leave to use his judgment as to when it is safe to pass – as opposed to being conditioned to obey a pigmented strip on the road as though it were a deity of some kind. Underpinning this is a premise that’s the opposite of that which governs here: The driver is assumed to be competent. More, he is expected to be competent.  The competent are not throttled down to the level of the not-competent, as they are here.

Europe, though riddled with Cloverism in so many ways, is actually pretty sensible when it comes to driving – and so, also when it comes to passing zones. Virtually everywhere is a passing zone. There, the double yellow is as uncommon as the broken yellow is here.

Of course, the primary reason for that is the much higher quality of the typical European driver. Unlike here, where the quality of the typical driver is incredibly low. And it is low chiefly because it is under-developed. Or rather,  because our system contrives in every way imaginable to make sure it is never developed. Teens, for example, are instructed to never exercise their own best judgment  – but rather, to always obey the law. Because the law is always right! It is infallible. It is perfect.

And must be obeyed.

People here are inculcated with dangerous nonsense, such as that business mentioned earlier about never exceeding the posted speed limit when passing. They are admonished that it’s “safer” to just sit behind the slow-mover and “be patient.” The idiocy of this business is perhaps best mocked by applying it to pedestrian traffic. If you came up behind, say, an old codger shuffling along at half your speed, would you “be patient” and adjust your pace to his? Would you only walk past him at a pace just slightly quicker than his?

Yet on the road, we’re supposed to do exactly that. It has bequeathed unto us the uniquely American phenomenon of one car doing 57 MPH attempting to “pass” another running 55.

And even that is technically illegal – and so, ticket-worthy.

Fear of such tickets – combined with stunted wheelman skills – has resulted in a nation of drivers who cannot (or will not) pass and when they do, it is often done with painful ineptitude. A slow-motion pass is much less safe than a proper high-speed pass. It requires more time – and longer sight distance. The more time you spend in the opposing lane of traffic, the greater the danger to oncoming traffic and yourself.

But, tell that to the cop – or the judge.

Years and years ago – before Cloverism became the New American Way – automakers touted the passing gear performance of their cars. To access the passing gear, you applied pressure to the gas pedal. The transmission would kick down – and the car would surge forward. You quickly (and so, safely) passed the slow-mover. You did not gimp slowly by – so slowly you could roll down the window and have a chat with the other driver.

Today’s cars are ferociously faster than the cars of that ancient, largely Clover-free era. The average new car is quicker (and faster) than most high-performance cars were, pre-Clover Ascendant. But they’re as useless as tits on a boar. Ornate codpieces on eunuchs is better, actually. A representation of virility.

One in desperate need of Viagra.

Throw it in the Woods?

original here.

3

Joyriding Ferris Bueller Style

Granted its no 1961 Ferrari GT California, but if someone went joyriding in my ’97 Chevy Cavalier Z24  (if I owned such a marvel of late 90′s engineering), I would be pissed to say the least. All I could think when I read this article was …

Vincent: It’a been worth him doing it just so I could’ve caught him doing it.
Lance: What a fucker!
Vincent: What’s more chicken shit than fucking with a man’s automobile? I mean, don’t fuck with another man’s vehicle.
Lance: You don’t do it.
Vincent: It’s just against the rules.
-Pulp Fiction

 

Camaro owner records mechanics abusing car, scheming to get damages paid for

 

When you own a sports car, you inevitably get a little paranoid about how it’s treated when in the care of strangers. One South Carolina man was worried enough that when he took his 2010 Chevrolet CamaroSS in for service at a Chevy dealer, he hid a voice recorder in the car. He was right to be worried: The recorder caught mechanics doing burnouts and discussing how to make the owner pay for a ruined clutch the car didn’t have before coming in. Now the Internet Justice League has taken the wheel.William Clark says he took his Camaro to Best Chevrolet-Kia in Easley, S.C. for a clunking noise in the car’s six-speed manual transmission. After a previous visit to a different dealer, his Camaro had died shortly after Clark retrieved it; while he suspected the staff at that dealership of joyriding, he had no proof at the time.

This time, the voice recorder hidden in the door pocket catches employees doing several burnouts and hard launches in the Camaro; Clark later says the techs drove it harder in 20 minutes than he had in three years. Once back in the shop, the mechanics realize the Camaro’s clutch has been fried, and come up with a plan to blame the damage on Clark, saying to “write it up as him buying a (expletive) clutch,” while saying another part failed under warranty so that General Motors would pay for its replacement.

Clark says he’s taken his evidence to the dealer and Chevrolet customer service; the dealer offered to reassess the damage or take the Camaro as a trade-in on another car, but refused Clark’s demand to buy the car back. Clark says Chevrolet customer service washed it hands of the problem, saying it was an issue between him and the dealer. As of the last update, the car’s smoked clutch remains untouched.

Unfortunately for Clark, there’s few other steps he can take that don’t end in court. Dealers are regulated by states; Clark can file a complaint with South Carolina officials, but even with an audio recording the assessment of damage isn’t so clear-cut as if the mechanics had wrecked it on a test drive. Instead, other Camaro owners have taken up the cause, posting Clark’s video to the dealership’s Facebook page and otherwise making noise about the problem.

You can hear the entire exchange, including the profanity, here. A lawyer for Best Chevrolet, in a request to Yahoo Autos to take down this story, told us in an email that the audio was “misleadingly edited.” Clark has said the dealership has threatened to sue him over the audio, but has also spoken with him about buying the Camaro back. The dealership may soon learn that in the Internet era, one burnt clutch can create quite the stink.

UPDATE: General Motors says in a statement that if the recording is valid it does not condone the behavior described, and that it is “actively working closely with the dealer to resolve this situation to the customer’s satisfaction.”

0

The Next “Model T”?

Eric Peters runs a great site; the info, ideas and discussions are simply outstanding IMO.

Here we get a two-fer.  Peters test-drives and reviews the 2013 Prius Plug-In hybrid and makes the bold statement that it might be the next generation “Model T.”  (Read the review here)  It isn’t perfect but it’s a real jump that could make the idea truly practical in a real sense.  FYI, he is no fan of hybrids/electric cars and his favorite ride is his classic Trans-Am.

Then his second article is more of a response to the fact that the need for gasoline powered cars might actually hit an inflection point and asking the question, what will be the government’s response.

This is very intriging to me, I don’t believe for one second that the guv-thugs want fuel efficient cars because it will improve America.  They promote it to grift the hoi-polloi and tricking the people to believe what isn’t true.  But what happens when it is true, the grift scheme they have been running becomes jeopardized.  Or does it just open the door to more taxation and even more control/monitoring?

So-called “smart meters” and ”mileage taxes” replacing the “gas tax” of today is likely inevitable.

The Bad News About Good Hybrids

October 9, 2012

By

I’m more than a little bit concerned the latest generation of plug-in hybrids (and all-electric cars) might actually work out. Because if they do, you can bet your bippie the government won’t let them get away with it.

Paranoid?

Internet commerce provides an ominous parallel. People were free to conduct business without tithing to the state. So-called e-commerce blossomed – the two obvious examples being Amazon and eBay. This could not be tolerated, of course – and the state is on the verge of passing new legislation that will force online retailers to collect taxes (see here) and even force users to file 1099s (in the case of eBay; see here) just like any “storefront” business, but without even the greasy pretext used to shakedown the “storefront” business – i.e., the fact that a physical business can be said to use the “resources” of the state/municipality and thus must compelled to “contribute” its “fair share” to the state/municipality.

Now, they just want the fucking money.

Or else.

And more than just the money, actually. They want to know what you bought – and sold – and to whom.

They want control. Absolute, total control. Of everything.

The state ruined Paypal – which originally provided a way for people to transact business anonymously and without cutting in Uncle Sam (a major “crime” in the USSA) and will soon ruin Amazon, eBay and countless other online retailers. The Net is about to be locked down as tight as anything else under government’s thumb. It was permitted to be free until it became too successful. And that is exactly what’s going to happen to the cars that are supposed to free us from $4 a gallon fill-ups. As soon as they can actually do that – and as soon as there are enough of them in people’s driveways – the boom will be lowered.

I suspect we’ll end up paying even more to drive – that is, whenever we’re allowed to drive.

I just got through reviewing the 2013 Toyota Prius plug-in hybrid. (See here for that.) Unlike all previous Priuii this one can realistically operate entirely on electricity. Fully charged, it has a range of about 14 miles or so so – enough to make it to the office for many people. If they can plug the car in at work, they might be able to make it back on electricity, too.

And that’s the rub.

Do you suppose the same government that will soon force eBay users to file 1099s and which is going to apply taxes to all formerly “tax-free” online purchases will stand back and do nothing as hundreds of thousands – then millions – of people buy a car that uses no or very little gas – and so pay no or very little gas taxes? Do you suppose it is possible the government will make electricity more expensive? Perhaps even limit access to it?

Right now, it costs very little – almost nothing – to charge up a plug-in hybrid like the Prius. The DOE says  the Prius needs about about  3.2 kilowatt-hours of  juice to travel 25 miles – which works out to about 75 cents’ worth of electricity (see here for more stats.) Put another way, the cost per mile is about 2-4 cents on electricity – as opposed to about eight cents per gallon for a vehicle burning $4 gas that gets 30 MPG.

Keep in mind that each gallon of gas includes roughly 60-75 cents of tax (federal, state,local). While electricity is also taxed, it is taxed far less. Right now, anyhow. How long do you suppose that’s going to last? What will the government do when a third of the vehicles out there burn no – or very little – gas? And their owners pay very little in the way of taxes? Will it stand idly by as revenue is diverted from its pockets back into the pockets of those who earned it (and who are trying to save it)?

Expect electricity to be heavily taxed in the near future. It will be sold as necessary for “conservation” and “the environment” – since so much of the electrical generating capacity of this country is based on coal and oil-fired utility plants. Instead of being the playthings of OPEC, our controllers will be much closer to home.

In our homes, in fact.

You may have heard about “smart meters.” These are being installed in homes all over the country – often, against the wishes of the homeowner. One guess why people might object…

No?

Here’s why: Smart meters make it possible for the power company to closely monitor your home’s electrical usage in real time – and gives the power company the ability to “adjust” how much power you may use at any given time. In New York – fief of Gauleiter Bloomberg – the power company can (and already does) turn down people’s home AC units while they’re away – in the name of “energy conservation.” The homeowner can – for the moment – over-ride the power company and turn the AC unit back up to whatever level he likes. But this “demonstration project” should give any thinking person the creeps. (Read up on smart meters here.)

Back to hybrids and electric cars. Imagine five or so years down the road. Millions of these cars are in circulation. They are drawing a considerable amount of power from the grid (or at least, that’s what we’ll be told).   The grid – already on the verge of blowing a fuse in 2012 – can’t handle the additional load.  Brown-outs (real or contrived) become routine. Go to the head of the class if you see where this is headed. Yup – restrictions on the use of electricity. In particular, its use for private transportation purposes.

Now here’s where it gets really clever.

Not only will Smart Meters allow the PTB to limit how much juice you’re allowed to download – into your home as well as into your hybrid/electric vehicle. Your vehicle – which will be equipped with a GPS transponder (as almost all new cars are already equipped with) can – and will be – turned on and off remotely, by the same PTB. Those of a certain vintage will recall the days when gas was rationed.

In the future, private transportation itself will be rationed.

You will be permitted to “fuel up” – and drive – only when (and where) your controllers say you may. And unlike the old days, there will be no end-running around this control grid.

High ethanol-content fuels such as E85 and E15 will eliminate most older vehicles – forcing people to buy a new vehicle, equipped with all the technology needed to keep track of them and control them. (Cars without this technology will be deemed “unsafe” – and either outlawed outright or required to be retrofitted with the required technology).

It’s all coming – and soon.

The moment hybrids and electrics actually work – that’s the moment when the hammer will come down.

Expect it.

Depend upon it.

Throw it in the Woods?

original found here.

0

A 4 Gallon Minimum?

Eric Peters with another great article.  As far as I am concerned, ethanol is the “devil’s lube” when getting piledriven by the guvthugs. 

I won’t try and explain it or comment on it, just read what Peters has put in front of us.  I dare you to not be insulted.

 

EPA Mandates How Much Gas You Must Buy

September 25, 2012

By

The government can force you to buy health insurance – so why not gas, too?

The EPA has just issued another mandate – this one requiring that people who buy gas at stations where E15 (15 percent ethanol content) is sold buy at least four gallons of fuel. (See here for the news story.)

Why, you ask?

Because EPA knows that E15 – which it is pushing aggressively (because of aggressive pushing by the corn lobby, which makes billions off the force-fed “sales” of its product) is extremely bad news for any vehicle made before model year 2001 – and nearly all outdoor power equipment such as lawn mowers and chainsaws and so on that were not designed to deal with high alcohol-content fuels. Alcohol-laced “gas” is extremely corrosive and – in older vehicles (and power equipment) that lack the ability to automatically adjust their air-fuel ratios to compensate – it causes a lean-running condition that can quickly overheat and destroy the engine.

So: On the one hand, EPA knows ethanol-laced fuel is bad news. On the other hand, it is pushing for ever-higher ethanol content fuels like E15. And in order to prevent what EPA surely realizes could be a potential PR disaster – and spoil its goal of mandating widespread use of E15 – it has decided to force us to buy at least four gallons of fuel at any station where E15 is sold, so that (for the moment) the damage caused by high-alcohol content fuels is minimized.

Here’s the deal: Many stations have multi-fuel pumps. You have probably used them. You select whatever payment method you’re going to use, then you select the type of fuel you want: regular, mid-grade or premium. It flows from the same nozzle. Which means, if the person before you bought E15, some of the backwash is going in your tank (or your lawnmower’s gas jug).

By forcing people to buy at least four gallons, the EPA is trying to make sure that enough real gas (or at least, “gas” with relatively low ethanol content) gets mixed in with the 15 percent ethanol E15 it is trying to cram down our throats at the behest of the agri-business cartels, under the guise of “renewable” and “clean” energy ( which, of course, it’s not) in order to avoid potentially embarrassing mass carnage of older vehicles and power equipment… at least, for a little while. Here it is, directly from the horse’s ass… er, mouth:

“EPA requires that retail stations that own or operate blender pumps either dispense E15 from a dedicated hose and nozzle if able or, in the case of E15 and E10 being dispensed from the same hose, require that at least four gallons of fuel be purchased to prevent vehicles and engines with smaller fuel tanks from being exposed to gasoline-ethanol blended fuels containing greater than 10 volume percent ethanol.” (Italics added.)

This is going to be fun for motorcycle owners  – because many bikes have tanks that don’t hold four gallons of fuel. Bikes with larger tanks only have slightly larger tanks. Most would have to be on the verge of running on fumes, in most cases, to take on four gallons of fuel. What happens when they can only take on 3.5 gallons? Or two? Will they be arrested? Tazered? What?

Gas is also heavy. It weighs about six pounds per gallon. This matters when you’re filling up a gas jug for outdoor power equipment. It’s why most jugs are 1 or 2/1/2 gallons – manageable. The next-up size is five gallons. It weighs 30 pounds – not quite so manageable. Will people be arrested – fined – or Tazered – for filling up gallon jugs instead of five gallon jugs?

But, all this is merely preliminary. A temporary inconvenience. The purpose of EPA’s four gallon mandate is to grease the skids for the bet-your-ass-it’s-coming mandate of E15 “gasoline.” Once E15 replaces E10 (the current mandate) then the problem is solved. No more need to fret the backwash – because all the “gas” will contain 15 percent corn piss.

And the reason for that, if you’re “paranoid” (read: someone who notices trends) is – beyond the obvious rent-seeking of the agri-business cartel – the EPA’s determination to end-run exterminate older (especially, pre-computer) vehicles. This serves several purposes. First, it “helps” another corporatist cartel -  the auto industry – since it de facto forces people to buy new cars – once their old cars have been rendered kaput. The corporatist state wants everyone on the monthly payment plan. Debt-free is anathema to its workings.

Second, killing off older vehicles eliminates the problem (for the government and its corporate cronies) of people outside the control grid. If you own an older, pre-computer car it is a threat to their plans because it is not subject to easy monitoring and control in the way a new car – fitted with mandatory Event Data Recorder black boxes and (almost always) a GPS receiver tied into its operating systems – is. When, for example, it becomes “the law” for all vehicles to be fitted with real-time data transponders that record everything you do behind the wheel (see Progressive Insurance; voluntary… for the moment) no vehicle not capable of being so monitored will be allowed.

Rather than the old frontal assault – an overt ban or even restrictions on their use – the subtler solution is to poison them to death. Feed them caustic fuel – and the “problem” takes care of itself.

Once E15 is mandated – and it will be mandated – the die will have been cast. Within a handful of years, anything not built to tolerate the alcohol-swill will be “retired.”

It’s devilishly clever, I’ll give them that. But it’s the work of the devil, nonetheless.

Throw it in the Woods?

Original article can be found here.

0

Auto Consignment

Used car lots that operate on a consignment basis is something I have never noticed or dealt with, but the premise is sound. 

For E. Peters’ friend it all worked out in the end but it just as easily could have gone incredibly wrong.  It is a real possibility that someone else might benefit from his experience as well. 

Just another reason to make sure you have you and the sellers ducks in a row whenever you purchase something bigger than a kit-kat.  There certainly are quite a few d-bags out ther.

 

Dealer Douchebaggery

September 4, 2012

By

It really can happen to anyone – even someone who is pretty hip when it comes to cars. Hell, it recently happened to me!

About six weeks ago (the date’s importance will become apparent in a minute) I went car shopping with a good friend of ours. She was interested in a convertible Toyota Solara that was for sale on the lot of a local – and higher-end – used car lot. The car itself was not the problem. Low miles, great condition, as advertised. It checked out – and my friend negotiated a fair price for it. She drove the convertible home with her dealer 30 day tags that very day. But when a month had gone by by and she hadn’t received her actual tags – or her title – she went back to ask how come. Usually, you get your permanent tags within a couple weeks or so – and the title paperwork should be handled within a few days of sale. Most dealers handle all this for you – just as this dealer promised to do. That’s when the proverbial cat leapt out of the bag.

Turns out, this used car lot is also a consignment lot – a fact which they neither advertised nor disclosed.

Now, there is nothing shady or unethical about consignment lots. What is a consignment lot? It’s a place that sells cars on behalf of their owners. You have a car you’d like to sell, but you don’t want to deal with tire-kickers or the paperwork. A consignment lot handles all that for you – plus puts your car on their lot, where it will probably get seen by more people than it would parked in your driveway. In return, you either pay a fixed fee, or a commission based on a percentage of the sales price, when the car actually sells.

Again, nothing shady or unethical about any of this – as such. Consignment lots can be a great way to sell-off your old car, when you’d prefer not to sell it yourself and aren’t looking to trade it in on a new car.

But there are some issues with buying a car this way that a prospective buyer ought to know about – and more, has a right to know about. And which the dealer/consignment lot has an obligation to put on the table.

Enter the problem. Because this dealer didn’t.

This car my friend bought? The dealer didn’t actually have the title to it. So they could not transfer it to her. The car was not only still technically the legal property of the person who gave it to the consignment lot to sell on their behalf – it had a bank lien on it. It was not paid-off. The title could not be transferred  until the lien holder had been paid off.

These facts were never mentioned to my friend during the transaction. Probably, the dealer figured they could get the paperwork sorted out quickly and no one would be the wiser. And no harm done.

But harm could have been done.

Since the dealer- the consignment lot -  didn’t have clear title to the car, technically, the car was not their legal property to sell. If, say, the price my friend paid was not sufficient to pay off the actual owner and the lienholder and one or both declined to sign off the title, my friend could have found herself out the money – and without the car. She’d have had to sue – or threaten to sue – the dealer/consignment lot. A huge PITAS, no matter how it turns out. Or, let’s say she had an accident a week after she bought the car. The fact that she wasn’t technically the legal owner could have resulted in serious headaches with her insurer – which assumed it was insuring her car and not some other person’s car.

Luckily for my friend, it turned out ok. Six weeks after she handed them a cashier’s check for the sales price, they finally handed her  the signed-over title to what is – at last – her car.

For the first six weeks, at least, it wasn’t.

I felt had. Probably as much as my friend did – only more so, because she had relied on me to suss out any cheesiness. This time, one slipped under the radar. As OJ might say, it happens. I’ve bought (and sold) dozens of vehicles over the years – and I know to ask to see a title with no liens on it before any money changes hands when you’re dealing with a private party seller. And also, to make sure that the person representing himself as the seller is also the legal owner of the vehicle he is trying to sell (or at least, that the title he has is signed-over already by the legal owner).

But at a dealership – a higher-end store, with no “consignment” signs anywhere – well, who’d a thunk it? I freely admit, I didn’t.

Point being: Assume nothing. In fact, assume the worst. It may be cynical to adopt that attitude, but it’s also the best way to avoid getting the short end of the stick.

Throw in the Woods?

original article here.

 

2

The AE86 is back

There was a certain amount of excitement surrounding Toyota when they were offering the Supra, MR2 and Celica in the 90′s.  It was Colin Chapman (founder of Lotus) that summed it up best when asked how to make a car fast, he responded “Add Lightness.”  One thing that has been missing from the current market is a lightweight, affordable, front engine, rear-wheel drive sport coupe.  No more with the launch of the Scion FR-S (and Subaru BRZ).  I have (and still do) own(ed) quite a few Toyotas, 2 MR2′s, 2 Corolla’s (one being a 4ag powered AE86 coupe), 2 Camry’s and a Tundra.  I am active in MR2 clubs and have been pulling for Toyota to come up with a winner and this might be it.

I will get the negative out of the way, the biggest complaint I have aside from the hype is the name, I wish the USDM version shared the JDM version’s name of ‘GT-86.’  The AE86 was obviously an inspiration, why not benefit from the classic 1980′s RWD lightweight Corolla?

From looking at the specs I like most of what I see.  The exterior is great (reminds me of the Lexus LFA supercar) and the interior looks quite good for the price in my opinion.  I had a mark2 MR2 turbo and currently own a SC’ed mark1 and I am disapointed in the lack a forced induction (or v6) option even if that version would have caused the price to creep closer to 30k.  The engine is a new design and it’s “flat” layout allows for a lower than normal center of gravity which will likely make the handling quite good.  I have much faith that HKS, Apex and Greddy will solve the horsepower problem in the aftermarket.

I typically drive by the local Toyota Dealership once a week in vain to see if they have one available.  I figure if I show up in my new-ish Tundra or my modified ’89 supercharged MR2 I will be able to sweet talk a proper test drive even though there is no chance I would buy one new.  I’ll keep this up until I get my opportunity and then I will share my firsthand thoughts.

 

Until then here is the Car and Driver First Drive from a few months back.

This site is protected by Comment SPAM Wiper.